CALCULATION OF INTEGRAL EFFICIENCY INDICATORS FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ROUTES IN THE UNITED STATES

Keywords: international freight transportation; road train; efficiency; route; logistics; optimization; method; criterion; multi-criteria analysis; Data Envelopment Analysis; AHP; TOPSIS; energy efficiency; transport efficiency; road efficiency; integral indicator; transport system; digital logistics solutions; route planning

Abstract

The paper investigates approaches to assessing route efficiency in the field of international freight transportation performed by single-unit road trains. The efficiency of international freight transportation by road trains is considered as a multifactorial characteristic that includes economic, time-related, environmental, social, and operational indicators. The authors emphasize the necessity of a comprehensive evaluation of logistics decisions, which should be based not only on traditional criteria such as transportation costs and delivery time but also take into account the energy, transport, and road efficiency of transport vehicles, as well as supply reliability, environmental sustainability, resource efficiency, and technological support of the transportation process. The study highlights the expediency of combining classical evaluation methods (cost per mile, delivery time, reliability indices) with modern multi-criteria decision-making approaches–Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and TOPSIS–which enable the consideration of a large number of parameters when selecting an optimal transportation route. Within the framework of a comparative analysis, the experience of the United States, Germany, Poland, and the United Kingdom in interpreting route efficiency is examined. It is noted that the emphasis in efficiency assessment depends on dominant priorities such as economic benefits, environmental safety, logistics chain reliability, or intermodal integration. German studies predominantly apply a sustainable development approach integrating time, cost, and infrastructure capacity criteria. Polish researchers actively use DEA tools to construct multidimensional efficiency models, whereas British studies focus on the assessment of external effects and energy efficiency. The results of leading studies on digital logistics optimization tools are systematized, including automated route planning systems, artificial intelligence–based solutions, and software platforms such as Route4Me, which contribute to reducing costs and CO₂ emissions, increasing transportation intensity, and improving system flexibility in response to demand fluctuations. The importance of telecommunication and navigation systems for monitoring the operational efficiency of road trains is emphasized, especially under conditions of complex terrain, toll road networks, and cross-border traffic. An expert–functional model for assessing route efficiency is proposed, which accounts for the energy, transport, and road efficiency of transportation process elements while considering the specific features of international freight transportation by road trains. It is emphasized that most contemporary studies analyze only individual parameters, whereas the proposed mathematical model integrates key factors to support well-founded managerial decision-making in the field of international road freight transportation. The necessity for further research aimed at overcoming data scarcity, limited flexibility of existing models, and insufficient coverage of critical logistics infrastructure risks is also highlighted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Lumenalta. What is freight routing? Guide to efficient routing, types, and benefits for logistics optimization. URL: https://lumenalta.com/insights/what-is-freight-routing (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

2. Мигаль В.Д. Інтелектуальні системи в технічній експлуатації автомобілів : монографія. Харків, 2018. 262 с.

3. McKinnon A. Performance measurement in freight transport: its contribution to the design, implementation and monitoring of public policy. International Transport Forum Discussion Paper. 2015. No. 2015-07.

4. Freight Transport and Logistics Masterplan. Federal Ministry for Digital and Transport (BMDV). 2023.

5. Baran J. The efficiency of the road transport sector in Poland and other member states of the European Union. Scientific Journal of Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities. Administration and Management Series. 2014. No. 103. P. 175–201.

6. Woodburn A. An analysis of rail freight operational efficiency and mode share in the British port-hinterland container market : dissertation. London, 2015.

7. Giuliano G., Kang S., Hegde S. Assessment of Freight System Efficiency Measure: GDP/GHG. URL: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/finalreports/ca18-3081-final-report-a11y.pdf (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

8. Beeontrade. Ocean Freight Charges: Factors, Formulas, and Examples. URL: https://www.beeontrade.com/blog/how-to-calculate-oceanfreight-charges-factors-formulas-and-real-life-examples (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

9. HSE Network. Top 10 Route Optimisation Software Providers in 2025. URL: https://www.hse-network.com/top-10-route-optimisation-softwareproviders/(дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

10. Sustainability Directory. Route Efficiency → Term. URL: https://sustainability-directory.com/term/route-efficiency/ (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

11. Reinberg S., Torrado López E. Multi-Criteria Decision Making for International Freight Transportation. Uppsala, 2024. URL: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1874953/FULLTEXT01.pdf (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

12. NetworkON. Route Optimization Software for Efficient Logistics. URL: https://networkon.io/resources/blog/route-optimization-software/ (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

13. Route4Me. Route4Me Route Planner on the App Store. URL: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/route4me-route-planner/id349853799 (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

14. Seiford L.M., Thrall R.M. Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 1994. Vol. 80. No. 3. P. 500–509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217 (94)00131-U.

15. Rahman M. Comparative analysis of AHP and TOPSIS methods in retail business location selection decision support system. Journal Electrical and Computer Experiences. 2024. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 52–57. URL: https://jurnal.tintaemas.id/index.php/jece/article/download/355/285/2585 (дата звернення: 31.07.2025).

16. Приходько В. Оцінювання енергоефективності сучасних автопоїздів для міжнародних вантажних перевезень. Сучаснi технологiї в машинобудуваннi та транспортi. Луцьк : ЛНТУ, 2025. С. 355–366.

17. Приходько В.Е. Знаходження інтегрального індексу енергетичної і транспортної ефективності для підвищення функціонування одноланкових автопоїздів у міжнародному сполученні. Вісник ХНТУ. 2025. С. 26–41.

18. Вікович І., Приходько В. Побудова інтегрального індексу енергетичної і транспортної та дорожньої ефективності автопоїздів для міжнародних вантажних перевезень. Вісник ВНТУ. 2025. № 5. С. 145–152.

19. Вікович І.А., Обшта А.Ф., Приходько В.Е. Економічна ефективність вантажних перевезень одноланковими автопоїздами в транспортних коридорах США. Вчені записки ТНУ імені В. І. Вернадського. Серія: Технічні науки. 2025. Том 36 (75). № 4. С. 280–286.
Published
2025-12-26
How to Cite
Vikovych, I., Obshta, A., & Prykhodko, V. (2025). CALCULATION OF INTEGRAL EFFICIENCY INDICATORS FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ROUTES IN THE UNITED STATES. Transport Development, (4(27), 108-121. https://doi.org/10.33082/td.2025.4-27.08
Section
TRANSPORT TECHNOLOGIES (BY TYPE)