SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A REVIEW OF POLICIES AND PRACTICES OF EUROPEAN INTERMODAL COMPANIES
Abstract
Introduction. This article explores the alignment of European intermodal transportation companies with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as part of the global sustainability agenda. In the context of increasing attention to sustainable development, transport companies have begun actively integrating the SDGs into their operational strategies. These efforts reflect a growing recognition that logistics chains must not only be economically efficient but also environmentally responsible and socially inclusive. The primary aim of this research is to examine the extent and nature of sustainable development initiatives among intermodal transport operators across Europe. Using a Case Study Research methodology, the study analyzes 123 companies, both signatories of the UN Global Compact and those that independently commit to sustainability principles. The analysis identifies ten key areas of activity – such as decarbonization, safety, gender equality, waste management, and anti-corruption – through which companies engage with the SDGs. The findings reveal that the most systematic and ambitious sustainability practices are pursued by large multinational corporations such as Maersk, CMA CGM, and Kuehne + Nagel. These companies have sufficient resources to invest in innovative technologies, digitalization, responsible procurement, and diversity initiatives. In contrast, smaller operators tend to adopt more flexible approaches, selecting specific SDG targets that align closely with their business capacities and market conditions. Despite the lack of a unified framework for sustainability implementation across the sector, many firms have successfully integrated ethical standards, environmental safeguards, and inclusive labor policies into their value chains. The study concludes that intermodal transport is a critical enabler of sustainable development, particularly in the areas of climate action, decent work, and responsible production. However, effective implementation of sustainability goals requires not only corporate commitment but also collaborative action through international alliances and coalitions. As such, partnerships – such as the Clean Cargo Working Group, the Getting to Zero Coalition, and the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network play an essential role in advancing global SDG progress within the transport sector. This paper underscores the importance of multidimensional, adaptable strategies tailored to each company’s operational context and global sustainability trends.
Downloads
References
2. Banister, D. (1992). Energy use, transport and settlement patterns. In M.J. Breheny (Ed.), Sustainable Development and Urban Form (pp. 160–181). London, UK : Pion.
3. Gordon, D. (1995). Sustainable Transportation: What Do We Mean and How Do We Get There? In D. Sperling & S. A. Shaheen (Eds.), Transportation and Energy: Strategies for a Sustainable Transportation System (pp. 1–11).
Washington, DC : American Council for an Energy‑Efficient Economy. 4. Nijkamp, P. (1994). Roads toward environmentally sustainable transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 28 (4). 261–271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(94)90002-7.
5. Whitelegg, J. (1993). Transport for a sustainable future: The case for Europe. London, UK : Belhaven Press.
6. Owens, S. (1995). From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy. 2 (1). 43–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(95)93245-T.
7. UNDP. (n.d.). Sustainable development goals. URL: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals.
8. United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.
9. Acciaro, M. (2011). Pricing in sustainable global container transport. International Journal of Decision Sciences, Risk and Management. 3 (3). 293–310.
10. Pawlik, T., Gaffron, P., & Drewes, P.A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility in maritime logistics. In D.-W. Song & P.M. Panayides (Eds.), Maritime Logistics (pp. 205–226). Bingley, UK : Emerald. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9781780523415-011.
11. Acciaro, M. (2015). Corporate responsibility and value creation in the port sector. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 18 (3). 291–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1027150.
12. Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L., Lekakou, M., & Stefanidaki, E. (2021). Cruise and container shipping companies: A comparative analysis of sustainable development goals through environmental sustainability disclosure. Maritime Policy & Management. 48 (2). 184–212.
13. Agudelo, M.A.L. (2017). Strategic corporate social responsibility in the container shipping industry: A case study of the Triple E as part of Maersk’s sustainability strategy (Doctoral dissertation).
14. Motlagh, H.R.S. (2020). Study the role of maritime energy management in achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs), in particular, Goal 7, in Oman maritime community. Sustainable Marine Structures. 2 (2). 1–12.
15. Kornowski, P. (2023). Towards sustainable shipping: The adoption of UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in the maritime container shipping industry (Master’s thesis, Universidade Católica Portuguesa).
16. Lähdeaho, O., Hilmola, O.P., & Kajatkari, R. (2020). Maritime supply chain sustainability: South‑East Finland case study. Journal of Shipping and Trade. 5 (1). 1–15.
17. Cunha, D.R., Pereira, N.N., de Santana Porte, M., et al. (2024). Sustainability practices for SDGs: A study of Brazilian ports. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 26. 9923–9944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03126-y.
18. Al Amien, D., Setyani, F.D., & Sihombing, R. (2020, December). Sustainable port planning in future Indonesian ports: A case study of Mafa Port based on UN SDGs. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 618 (1). 012041.
19. Argyriou, I., Daras, T., & Tsoutsos, T. (2022). Challenging a sustainable port: A case study of Souda port, Chania, Crete. Case Studies on Transport Policy. 10 (4). 2125–2137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.007.
20. Roh, S., Thai, V.V., Jang, H., & Yeo, G.T. (2021). The best practices of port sustainable development: A case study in Korea. Maritime Policy & Management. Advance online publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1979266.
21. Asgari, N., Hassani, A., Jones, D., & Nguyen, H.H. (2015). Sustainability ranking of the UK major ports: Methodology and case study. Transportation Research. Part E. 78. 19–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.01.014.
22. Berechman, J., & Tseng, P.H. (2012). Estimating the environmental costs of port related emissions: The case of Kaoshiung. Transportation Research. Part D. 17 (1). 35–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.009.
23. Chang, C.C., & Wang, C.M. (2012). Evaluating the effects of green port policy: Case study of Kaoshiung Harbour in Taiwan. Transportation Research. Part D: Transport and Environment. 17 (3). 185–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.11.006.
24. Wiegmans, B. W., & Louw, E. (2011). Changing port-city relations at Amsterdam: A new phase at the interface? Journal of Transport Geography. 19 (4). 575–583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.06.007.
25. Villalba, G., & Gemechu, E.D. (2011). Estimating GHG emissions of marine ports – the case of Barcelona. Energy Policy. 39 (3). 1363–1368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.12.008.
26. Roh, S., Thai, V.V., & Wong, Y.D. (2016). Towards sustainable ASEAN port development: Challenges and opportunities for Vietnamese ports. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics. 32 (2). 107–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.05.004.
27. Hossain, T., Adams, M., & Walker, T.R. (2019). Sustainability initiatives in Canadian ports. Marine Policy. 106. 103519.
28. A.P. Moller-Maersk. (2024, July 20). A.P. Moller – Maersk and IBM to discontinue TradeLens, a blockchain-enabled global trade platform [Press release]. Maersk. URL: https://www.maersk.com/news/articles/2022/11/29/maersk-and-ibm-to-discontinue-tradelens
29. ZIM. (2023). ZIM ESG report 2023 (p. 17). URL: https://www.zim.com/assets/pjgntgj5/zim-esg-report-2023.pdf#page=17
30. DB Schenker. (n.d.). DB code of conduct for business partners. URL: https://www.dbschenker.com/resource/blob/819872/48b909233624b57ce8c056c87839f75c/compliance-eng-db-code-of-conduct-forbusiness-partners-valid-from-2019-05-01-data.pdf
31. Kuehne + Nagel International AG. (n.d.). Kuehne+Nagel supplier code of conduct 2024. URL: https://home.kuehne-nagel.com/documents/20124/72221/kuehne-nagel-supplier-code-of-conduct-2024.pdf/cfa86ffaec3c-9152-0214-96223acaefb7?t=1733734018722
32. Hupac Intermodal. (n.d.). Hupac code of conduct. URL: https://www.hupac.com/Code-of-Conduct-6930be00?MasterId=g1_8256
33. United Nations Global Compact. (n.d.). Our participants. URL: https://unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/participants/search?button=&page=1&search%5Bkeywords%5D=PSA
34. SLOCAT Partnership on Sustainable, Low Carbon Transport. (2020, March 17). 2030 agenda: SDGs. SLOCAT. URL: https://slocat.net/our-work-2022/2030-agenda-sdgs/.
35. Rail Cargo Group. (n.d.). Gender diversity in the ÖBB Rail Cargo Group: an update. Rail Cargo Group Blog. URL: https://blog.railcargo.com/en/artikel/she-is-railcore-part-2
36. Hellmann Worldwide Logistics. (n.d.). Social. URL: https://www.hellmann.com/en/report-2024/social.
37. A.P. Moller-Maersk. (n.d.). LGBTQIA+. URL: https://www.maersk.com/careers/diversity-equity-and-inclusion/lgbtqi-plus
38. Chronicle.lu. (2025, May 28). CFL signs women in rail agreement. Chronicle.lu. URL: https://chronicle.lu/category/rail/38275-cfl-signswomen-in-rail-agreement
39. GROUPE CFL. (n.d.). Politique égalité femmes‑hommes. URL: https://groupe.cfl.lu/Cfl.Groupe/media/Publications/CSR/Politique_20_C3_A9galite_20femmes-hommes.pdf
40. CEVA Logistics; ENGIE; SANEF. (n.d.). CEVA Logistics, ENGIE and SANEF launch an alliance to decarbonize road freight transport. URL: https://www.cevalogistics.com/en/news-and-media/Newsroom/ceva-logistics-engie-and-sanef-launch-an-alliance-to-decarbonize-roadfreight-transport
41. Hapag‑Lloyd AG. (n.d.). Society – Hapag‑Lloyd. URL: https://www.hapag-lloyd.com/en/company/responsibility/sustainability/engagement.html
42. DB Schenker. (2022, May 13). DB Schenker moves for Ocean Conservancy. URL: https://www.dbschenker.com/global/db-schenker-moves-for-oceanconservancy-779984
43. Smart Freight Centre. (n.d.). Smart Freight Centre: Clean Cargo program. URL: https://www.smartfreightcentre.org/en/our-programs/maritime/clean-cargo-1/
44. Indicators Report. (n.d.). 17.6 Enhance North–South, South–South and triangular cooperation on science, technology and innovation. URL: https://indicators.report/targets/17-6/
45. Maritime Anti‑Corruption Network. (2025, May 19). MACN members. URL: https://macn.dk/macn-members/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
